I believe in the goddess Feza. I believe that she created this universe and everything in it. The reason behind everything. I adore her and pray to her.
I was not surprised to hear that the universe came into existance through the Big Bang. Because she already told us in the scriptures that all what we can see was created from a single point.
I have always felt that all atheists are stubborn. At first the universe was a single point known as singularity. With its expansion came space-time. So it would be foolish to ask what happened before the Big Bang or where the Big Bang took place. It all starts with a singularity that transcends space and time. Singularity is spontaneous.
Then how hard it is to believe in the goddess who created that singularity. It would be foolish to ask what her beginning was or where she is. Because she is beyond space and time. In short, aren't the logic of both of us the same?
Both say that the root cause of the universe came into being by chance. Whose root cause is more credible ?. For this universe being complex, Feza must be super complex to create it. And she is. Which is more accurate, to believe that she came into existance on her own or to believe that the universe, which is simpler than her, came into existance by itself? If you put it like that, the second one is more likely to be correct. But the stubbornness of my mind is to believe that there is a Creator behind everything.
Is the singularity they say the same as the Feza I say? Both are timeless and are the root cause of everything. If so, all I see is Feza, myself included. But she is not omnipotent or supreme as I think, nor is she able to answer prayers, nor is she able to interfere in my birth, life or death.
Feza is my imagination with whom I can share joys and sorrows, who can fully understand my feelings. She will exist until I exist. The universe will exist even though I do not.
Feza, thank you for filling the gaps of my knowledge for so long. I will miss you.
Naseef P.P.

Comments
Post a Comment